1
سیاسی و روابط بین الملل::
پادمانهای فراگیر
The United States. for its pan, felt strongly that the Conference should promote full-scope safeguards under IAEA by calling on members of the non-proliferation regime to enter into new nuclear supply commitments only with those States that accepted IAEA safeguards on all their peaceful nuclear activities.
A large number of delegations, among them those of Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom, expressed the view that the acceptance of full-scope safeguards by ail non-nuclear-weapon States would strengthen confidence that no nuclear materials or facilities could be used for making nuclear weapons or other explosive devices.
Some participants, for instance Norway, argued for a universal application of the conditions applicable to exports of material or equipment covered by article III of the Treaty as a requirement for the transfer of such material, while others, like Japan, favored an appeal to non-nuclear-weapon States not parties to the Treaty to agree to submit their nuclear activities to full-scope safeguards.
The United States asserted that there was a middle way between those two approaches which would not compel exporting countries, under article III (2) of the Treaty, to insist on acceptance of full-scope safeguards by non-nuclear-weapon States which were not parties, but would include the formulation of a recommendation to that effect.
The Philippines raised the question as to whether full-scope safeguards should be considered de jure or de facto.
واژگان شبکه مترجمین ایران